Skip to content

Services Get found

the page is live but it will not rank

On page SEO services, done page by page

from $75

On page SEO services: titles, headings, internal links and schema, set so Google understands what each page is for. Sharpened across 740+ client sites.

What's included

  • Title tags and meta descriptions, written to earn the click
  • Heading structure that maps to how people search
  • Internal links that pass authority to the pages that matter
  • Schema and structured data where it helps
  • Content aligned to real search intent, not keyword stuffing
  • The technical basics, canonicals, alt text, and clean URLs

Price

  • Up to 25 pages$75
  • 26 to 50 pages$140
  • 51 to 100 pages$250
  • 101 to 200 pages$450

Over 200 pages is quoted per site. Every tier is the same work on every page, the rate per page just falls as the count climbs.

See every service price

Ranking is not luck. A page ranks when Google can tell exactly what it is about and trust that it answers the query. On-page SEO is the unglamorous work that makes that happen: the title, the headings, the internal links, the schema, the structure.

I go through your pages one at a time and fix what holds them back, then tell you what changed and why. No guesswork, and no thousand-item audit you will never action.

The pages worth fixing first

The first thing I look at is not your worst pages. It is the ones sitting just outside where the clicks are: position eight to thirty, on a query with real volume, taking almost nothing. Those pages have already cleared the hardest bar, which is being considered at all. Something specific is capping them, and it is usually the title, the depth against what page one covers, or the fact that nothing on the site links to them properly.

Fixing those is faster and cheaper than starting new pages, and the result is measurable against a number that already existed.

Impressions without clicks is a different problem

If Search Console shows a page picking up impressions and almost no clicks, that page is ranking and being skipped. The fix is not more content or more links. It is a title and description that say what the reader would have to click to find out, and a snippet that matches the query rather than the brand.

This is the highest-return work in on page SEO and the most often skipped, because it does not look like enough effort to charge for.

Where it pairs with indexing

Getting a page into Google’s index is step one; on-page work is what tells Google what the page means once it is there. Clients usually bring me pages that are indexed but stuck on page three, or pages that rank for the wrong query entirely.

The order matters. On page work on a page that is not in the index changes nothing, because nothing is reading it. If you are not sure which of the two you are looking at, start in Search Console rather than in a rank tracker, and read why pages do not show on Google before buying either.

Writing for the pages and for the answer engines

The same structure that helps a reader skim now also decides whether an answer engine can lift a passage from your page: the question as the heading, the answer directly under it, one idea per paragraph. That is not a separate service bolted on, it is what good heading structure has always been, and it is covered in AI search visibility.

If you are not sure whether your pages are held back by the writing or by the site underneath them, on-page SEO vs technical SEO has the one test I use to decide.

Send me the pages you care about and I will quote the work.

  1. step 1 · auditI crawl the pages and pull their Search Console data to see what Google currently makes of them.
  2. step 2 · rewriteTitles, descriptions, headings, internal links, and schema, fixed page by page with a note on what changed and why.
  3. step 3 · resubmitUpdated pages go back through Search Console and get tracked until the changes are picked up.

before you ask

Common questions.

How many pages do you work on at once?

Fewer than you probably want to buy, and deliberately. The pages worth doing first are the ones already ranking somewhere between position eight and thirty on a term with real demand, because those have proved they can rank and are being held back by something specific. On most sites that is a handful, not the whole catalogue. Working through a hundred pages at a uniform depth spends the same money for a much weaker result.

Will rewriting my titles cost me rankings I already have?

It can, and anyone who tells you otherwise has not done enough of it. That is why the pages that already perform get left alone or changed carefully, and why every change is recorded with the position it started from. If a rewrite makes something worse, the previous title is one edit away and the record says exactly what it was. The risk is real but it is bounded, and it is smaller than the cost of leaving a page invisible.

Do you rewrite the page content, or only the tags?

Both, where both are the problem, but they are separate jobs and they are quoted as separate jobs. Tag and structure work is the cheap half: title, description, headings, internal links, schema. Rewriting the body is content work, and if a page is losing because page one covers three things it does not, no amount of tag work rescues it. I will tell you which of the two your pages actually need before you buy either.

When will the changes show up in Google?

After the page is recrawled, which is not something I or anyone else controls, and which is why nobody honest will give you a date. What can be controlled is making sure the recrawl is requested rather than waited for, and that the page is actually eligible to be reindexed when it happens. Every updated page goes back through Search Console for that reason, and gets watched until the new title appears in the results rather than until the work is invoiced.

Do I need this if my traffic is already growing?

Possibly not, and that is a fair answer to give. Growing traffic usually means the pages are being found and the topic has room, in which case publishing more is a better use of the money than polishing what exists. The case for on page work is strongest when impressions are healthy and clicks are not, because that gap is almost always a title and snippet problem rather than a ranking problem, and it is the cheapest thing on this site to fix.

Everything else I run.